Skip to content

feat(app-server): add review and model parity APIs#570

Open
cbusillo wants to merge 2 commits intojust-every:mainfrom
cbusillo:feat/app-server-parity-apis
Open

feat(app-server): add review and model parity APIs#570
cbusillo wants to merge 2 commits intojust-every:mainfrom
cbusillo:feat/app-server-parity-apis

Conversation

@cbusillo
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cbusillo cbusillo commented Apr 3, 2026

Summary

  • add native app-server handling for model/list and review/start
  • build v2 review requests from ReviewTarget and route both inline and detached review flows
  • sync the local thread/resume compatibility shim to the finalized parity behavior used by the tested integration build

Testing

  • cargo test -p code-app-server --quiet
  • ./build-fast.sh
  • manual JSON-RPC probe through the PATH-linked /opt/homebrew/bin/code binary covering model/list, inline review/start, and detached review/start

Finish the thread/resume compatibility shim and add native model/list and review/start handlers to the local app-server compatibility layer.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1db853c599

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread code-rs/app-server/src/code_message_processor.rs Outdated
Comment thread code-rs/app-server/src/code_message_processor.rs Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant